fast4truth2

Instructions and contact details link at top of Start Menu  

Tolley Guilty, but mere Conditional Discharge


Although Tolley had the arrogance to plead "Not Guilty!"
on the basis that
"It was a prank between consenting adults
that did not warrant a criminal conviction!"
,
it failed to convince the Magistrates.

Tolley was found "Guilty!"

Tim Wilmot suggests
that council solicitors rarely attack people in the street
because normally they confine their violence to courts.

It must have been obvious to the Magistrates
that these were unusual circumstances,
which makes the Conditional Discharge
a little hard to understand.

Unless you take the view
that Tolley was "one of them",
to be protected.

-===============================================================================-
Link - Had it been Tim Wilmot, not Tolley - sequential
-===============================================================================-
Link - Return to Start Menu to Tolley meets Public Order Act 1986 section
-===============================================================================-
Click "back" to your last webpage location

[C] 2010 - Zen asserts copyright on text, context, and design.
-===============================================================================-
Go to Instructions & Contact Details at top of Start Menu for:-
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
1. you want to use some of this site for a non-commercial purpose.
2. you want to use some of this site for a commercial purpose.
3. you want to use the design of this site for your own legal work,
    and would welcome professional assistance.
-===============================================================================-
This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours? Zen wishes to say "Thank You!" to BLOGGER
-===============================================================================-