fast4truth2

Instructions and contact details link at top of Start Menu  

Planners briefed on site meeting



Naturally Tim Wilmot was barred from the briefing,
so what he knows is from the
police witness statement of Dr Ankers.

-====================================================-

8a.    When we arrived at Luxstowe House, Liskeard,
8b.    Robert REID and myself
8c.    went and spoke with Mr Alan HARTRIDGE, the Planning Officer,
8d.    when we advised him of our findings in relation to 'Target Tip'.

9.1a.    I cannot recall the exact words,
9.1b.    but at this meeting I remember it becoming apparent at an early stage
9.1c.    that Alan HARTRIDGE was going to recommend refusal of Mr WILMOT's planning application,
9.1d.    together with reasons for his objections.

9.2a.    I remember having the impression that Mr HARTRIDGE's reasons
9.2b.    were sound and ostensibly, in order,
9.2c.    and not with malice or prejudice.

10.1a.    I did not form the impression that our comments to Mr Alan HARTRIDGE
10.1b.    formed any significant basis
10.1c.    for Alan HARTRIDGE's grounds for opposing Mr WILMOT's application.

10.2a.    It seemed as though there were other, stronger reasons,
10.2b.    that Mr HARTRIDGE had.

11a.    Both Robert REID and myself left Luxstowe House at the conclusion of the meeting
11b.    and I remember hoping that we did not see Mr WILMOT as we left the building
11c.    as we were aware of the likely outcome of the planning application,
11d.    based on what Mr HARTRIDGE had said to us.

-====================================================-

Ankers' statement sums it all up.

10.2a.    It seemed as though there were other, stronger reasons,
10.2b.    that Mr HARTRIDGE had.

The Chief Planning Officer had FAR stronger reasons for wanting refusal
than mere landfill gas.


-====================================================-

Ankers witness statement blows a gaping hole
in Caradon District Council's report dated 22 NOV 90.


6.3a.    The application was dealt with by his staff
6.3b.    and there is no evidence whatsoever to support Mr WILMOT's contention
6.3c.    that the Planning Officer took any action himself
6.3d.    in relation to the application.

-====================================================-
Link - Planning Committee Tea Break - Part One - sequential
-====================================================-
Link - Return to Start Menu to Site Meeting section
-===============================================================================-
Click "back" to your last webpage location

[C] 2010 - Zen asserts copyright on text, context, and design.
-===============================================================================-
Go to Instructions & Contact Details at top of Start Menu for:-
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
1. you want to use some of this site for a non-commercial purpose.
2. you want to use some of this site for a commercial purpose.
3. you want to use the design of this site for your own legal work,
    and would welcome professional assistance.
-===============================================================================-
This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours? Zen wishes to say "Thank You!" to BLOGGER
-===============================================================================-